The influence of result dissemination on employees’ performance in Alebtong district. Across-sectional study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64792/182sws45Keywords:
Teacher performance, Public primary schools, Apapai Sub-County, Physical and perceived school environmentAbstract
Background.
Employees often find themselves in situations where they must change direction frequently.
Therefore, employee seeks constant feedback to determine whether the direction they are
working is what is expected by the organization. Performance appraisal policy for employees
must be frequent, accurate, specific and timely. This study aimed at assessing the influence of
result dissemination on employees’ performance in Alebtong district.
Methodology.
A cross-sectional research design that exploited a quantitative-approach was adopted. The
sample size was 141 participants, the study population included principal officers, senior
officers, officers, and senior assistants, assistant officers, and subordinate staff respectively.
Results.
(40.43) of the participants had 5-10 years of experience, (33.33%) of the participants had
Bachelor's degrees level of education. Results dissemination had a positive coefficient of 0.255,
and it is statistically significant (p < 0.01). This suggests that effective result dissemination is
associated with improved employee performance. When results are communicated well within
the organization, employees are more likely to perform better. Result Dissemination had a
correlation of (0.406), indicating that as these variables increase, employee performance tends to
increase as well. most employees agree that regular feedback is provided by supervisors, as
evident from a combined 73.8% of respondents either strongly agreeing or agreeing
Conclusion.
Effective result dissemination within the organization is associated with improved employee
performance, highlighting the importance of clear result communication for better employee
outcomes.
Recommendation.
Organizations should prioritize clear result dissemination through transparent communication
channels, including technology-driven platforms. Additionally, provide training to managers for
constructive feedback delivery to foster a culture of continuous improvement and engagement.
References
Akinbowale, & Lourens. (2014). Employee Performance Measurement and Performance.
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. doi:10.5901/mjss. 2014.v5n9p342
Backhau, & Hamers. (2022). Factors contributing to innovation readiness in health care
organizations: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research volume 22, Article
number: 997 (2022). doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08185-x
Baidhani, & Alsaqqaf. (2022). Do Performance Appraisal Process and Communication Between
Managers and Subordinates Affect Job Satisfaction? Dissertation.
doi:10.2139/ssrn.4215344
Bartsiotas, & Achamkulangare. (2016). Fraud prevention, detection and response in united
nations system organizations. jiu/rep/2016/4.
Beard, & Shapiro, (2021). A Model for Strengthening Mentors: Frames and Practices. Int J
Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun; 18(12): 6465. doi:10.3390/ijerph18126465
Chubb, & Reilly. (2011). Performance Management. Copyright © 2011 Institute for Employment
Studies.
Hannay. (2014). Fairness in Peer Evaluations: Ensuring Organizational ustice in the Classroom.
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice vol. 14(2) 2014 61.
Kent. (2018). Giving Meaning to Everyday Work After Terrorism. Dissertation.
doi:10.1177/0170840618765582
Levitas, & Pantazis. (2017). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. Dissertation.
Lourens, & Jinabhai. (2014). Employee Performance Measurement and Performance Appraisal
Policy in an Organisation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. doi:10.5901/mjss.
2014.v5n9p342
Nzume. (2016). AN assessment of the performance appraisal process in pelonomi tertiary
hospital. copyright © 2016 stellenbosch University.
O’Kane, & McCracken. (2018). Performance Management: A Scoping Review of the Literature
and an Agenda for Future Research. dissertation. doi:10.1177/153448431879853
OPM.GOV. (2017). A Handbook for Measuring Employee Performance. dissertation.
Ruano, & Heine. (2019). Does Teacher Collaboration Improve Student Achievement? Analysis
of the German PISA 2012 Sample. Front. Educ., 13 August 2019.
doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00085
Selzer, & Clarke. (2014). Disease-specific neurorehabilitation systems. dissertation.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511995590.044
UN. (2017). Performance Management at the United Nations. Performance Management
Challenges: A 2017 Review.
WHO? (2022). maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience. DISSERTATION.
Woerkom, & Kroon. (2020). The relationship between Strengths-Based Performance Appraisal
on Perceived Supervisor Support and the Motivation to I Cheng, & Hui. (2017). Leniency
Bias in Performance Ratings: The Big-Five Correlates. Front. Psychol., 10 April 2017.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00521 improve Performance. Front Psychol. 2020; 11: 1883.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01883.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Collins Constant Alunga, Dr. Muhamad Ssendagi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is the most open of the Creative Commons licenses. It allows others to copy, share, remix, adapt, and build upon the material — even for commercial purposes — provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s).
You are free to:
-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
-
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
-
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. Other rights, such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights, may limit how you use the material.
