Accountability mechanisms used in managing capitation grants in government-aided secondary schools in Ntungamo District. A cross-sectional study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64792/vdzr9e10Abstract
Background
The study aimed to analyze the existing accountability mechanisms used in managing the capitation grant in government-aided secondary schools in Ntungamo District.
Methodology
The study adopted a descriptive and correlational research design using a mixed-methods approach. It covered 10 government-aided secondary schools in Ntungamo District, with 51 targeted respondents and a sample of 47 selected through stratified random and purposive sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews involving Board of Governors members, headteachers, District Education Officials, and auditors. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation in SPSS Version 25, while qualitative data were analysed thematically to identify accountability and grant utilization patterns.
Results
All 30 respondents participated, yielding a 100.0% response rate. Full Board Chairpersons were 80.0% male and 20.0% female, while Finance Committee Chairpersons were 60.0% male and 40.0% female. Accountability mechanisms were strong among Full Board Chairpersons (overall mean=4.40) and Finance Committee Chairpersons (mean=4.02), but weaker among Teacher Representatives (mean=3.20). Full Board Chairpersons rated compliance with financial regulations highest (mean=4.80, SD=0.422), while Finance Committees rated verification of financial records highest (mean=4.60, SD=0.699). FMIS practices were weakest, scoring 3.70 (SD=1.160) for Full Boards, 2.90 (SD=1.197) for Finance Committees, and 2.10 (SD=0.994) among Teacher Representatives. Qualitative themes emphasized needs-based budgeting, stakeholder participation, expenditure authorization, supporting documentation, financial reviews, adherence to government guidelines, and prioritization of learning materials, sanitation, repairs, and utilities.
Conclusion
Accountability mechanisms in government-aided secondary schools include budgeting, financial record-keeping, adherence to national regulations, approval hierarchies, phased disbursement, audits, documentation, regular financial reviews, and enforcement of sanctions.
Recommendation
School leaders should adopt more structured and consistent accountability strategies through clear, timely, and transparent budgeting and financial reporting in line with Ministry of Education and Sports guidelines.
References
1. Gichuki, C., & Mwangi, W. (2018). Financial management practices in secondary schools. Kenyan Journal of Education, 9(4), 112–125.
2. Kipkebe, J., et al. (2019). Financial management in secondary schools: Practices and challenges. Kenyan Journal of Education, 14(3), 150–165.
3. Mugabi, L., & Nuwagaba, S. (2020). Financial oversight and school management in Uganda. Uganda Journal of Education, 22(1), 77–92.
4. Ministry of Education and Sports. (2019). Uganda secondary schools capitation grant policy. Government of Uganda.
5. Ministry of Education and Sports. (2021). Report on school management committees and accountability. Government of Uganda.
6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Promoting stakeholder participation in education governance. OECD Education Working Papers.
7. Uganda Ministry of Finance. (2020). Capitation grant disbursement guidelines. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513544274.002
8. Uganda National Education Review Commission. (2021). Report on education financing and oversight. Government of Uganda.
9. Uganda Office of the Auditor General. (2022). Annual report on education sector financial management.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Robert Bob Bangirana, Dr. Enock Barigye, Rev.Dr.Judith Arinaitwe (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is the most open of the Creative Commons licenses. It allows others to copy, share, remix, adapt, and build upon the material — even for commercial purposes — provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s).
You are free to:
-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
-
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
-
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. Other rights, such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights, may limit how you use the material.

