Budget control and financial accountability among local governments in Buhweju District. A cross-sectional study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64792/phbh7h48Keywords:
Budget formulation, Budget coordination, Budget implementation, Public resource management, Financial transparency, Expenditure monitoringAbstract
Background:
The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between budget control and financial accountability among local governments in Buhweju District.
Methodology:
The study adopted a cross-sectional quantitative survey design targeting 83 local governments in Buhweju District. 68 local governments were sampled, with 95 respondents selected through stratified, simple random, and purposive sampling. Primary data were gathered through a self-administered questionnaire using five-point Likert scales. Instrument validity was established through expert assessment (CVI=0.857), and reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha. Data were entered, cleaned, and analysed in SPSS version 26 using Pearson correlation and regression. Ethical approval and confidentiality were maintained.
Results:
The study obtained 81 completed questionnaires from 95 administered, representing an 85.0% response rate, while 55 of 68 targeted local governments responded (80.9%). Regarding education, 51.9% (n=42) of respondents held degrees, 25.9% (n=21) held postgraduate qualifications, and 22.2% (n=18) held diplomas. Of the local governments, 78.2% (n=43) had operated for 5–10 years, while 21.8% (n=12) had operated for less than 5 years. Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant positive relationships between independence and competence (r=.730, p<.01), workload (r=.553, p<.01), budget control (r=.783, p<.01), and financial accountability (r=.616, p<.01). Competence was significantly associated with workload (r=.472, p<.01), budget control (r=.655, p<.01), and financial accountability (r=.692, p<.01). Budget control significantly correlated with financial accountability (r=.697, p<.01), while budget formulation (r=.546, p<.01), coordination (r=.664, p<.01), and implementation (r=.678, p<.01)
Conclusion:
Budget control is a significant predictor of financial accountability among local governments in Buhweju District.
Recommendation:
The district should strengthen mechanisms for communicating audit findings to management and council and ensure timely implementation of audit recommendations.
References
1. Atukunda, G., Atwiine, J., Musiita, B., Atwine, A., & Koruragire, E. (2024). Budgetary control, managerial competencies, and performance of higher local governments in Eastern Uganda. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 16(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v16i2(J).3836
2. Baron, D. P. (2007). Business and its environment. Pearson Prentice Hall.
3. Bedford, D. S., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2022). Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101346
4. Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.001.0001
5. Eton, M., Mwosi, F., & Ogwel, B. P. (2022). Are internal controls important in financial accountability? (Evidence from Lira District Local Government, Uganda). International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 3(4), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v3i4.810
6. Güngör Göksu, G. (2023). A retrospective overview of the Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management using bibliometric analysis. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(2), 264–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2022-0061
7. Kristiyanti, L. M. S. (2021). The implementation of good corporate governance, village apparatus performance, organizational culture, and their effects on village fund management accountability (Case study of Tulung District, Klaten Regency). Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(1), 1985–1996.
8. Leoni, G., Lai, A., Stacchezzini, R., Steccolini, I., Brammer, S., Linnenluecke, M., & Demirag, I. (2021). Accounting, management and accountability in times of crisis: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1305–1319.
9. Li, H., & Guo, Y. (2022). Performance management of university financial budget execution relying on comprehensive budget management strengthening model. Advances in Multimedia, 2022, Article 4758609.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4758609
10. Meyer, R. L., Pauly, L. W., & Robinson, T. (2014). The global public accountability framework. Oxford University Press.
11. Nyamori, R. O. (2009). Making development accountable: A critical analysis of the systems of accounting and accountability for the Constituency Development Fund in Kenya. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 5(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910910963436
12. Priantono, S., & Vidiyastutik, E. D. (2022). The influence of internal control system and accountability of village fund allocation management on village financial performance. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 6(1), 18–26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Justus Musimenta, Benjamin Musiita, Ogaba Ariyo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is the most open of the Creative Commons licenses. It allows others to copy, share, remix, adapt, and build upon the material — even for commercial purposes — provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s).
You are free to:
-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
-
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
-
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. Other rights, such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights, may limit how you use the material.

